Resources for insight and
inspiration
Guides
Insights
Understanding Acceleration: Protecting Startup Talent Through Vesting Strategies
Acceleration is a mechanism in equity compensation that allows employees or founders to vest their stock options faster than the original schedule. It is most often triggered by significant events like a company acquisition. Acceleration ensures that key contributors are fairly compensated during major transitions and protects the value of their equity.
Vesting Schedules: The Strategic Foundation of Startup Equity Compensation
For both founders and employees, vesting schedules are more than a technical requirement. They are a strategic tool that determines how equity is earned, how long employees remain motivated, and how well a startup protects its ownership structure. A well-designed vesting schedule can strengthen retention, build loyalty, and align incentives between the company and its team.
Equity Incentive Plans / Equity Stock Option Plans
For startup founders, an option pool is more than a technical detail - it’s a strategic tool. The size, structure, and timing of your equity incentive plan can determine your ability to attract top talent, align incentives, and keep your company’s cap table clean for future investors.
Option Pools and Acquisitions: Navigating the Equity Landscape
When a startup is acquired, the treatment of its option pool becomes a critical factor for both founders and employees. Option pools influence retention, compensation, and how value is distributed during a merger or acquisition. Understanding what happens to these equity instruments helps founders negotiate better terms and employees make informed financial decisions.
FAQs
Open allNot always, but they are common. Some early-stage investors accept uncapped SAFEs if they have strong conviction in the company.
A cap sets the maximum valuation for conversion, while a discount lowers the share price relative to the next round’s investors. Many instruments include both, and investors convert using whichever is more favorable.
Typically 30–60 days, though shorter timelines may be negotiated to avoid deal delays.
A ROFR (Right of First Refusal) allows the company or investors to match a third-party offer. A ROFO (Right of First Offer) requires the shareholder to offer their shares internally before seeking outside buyers.
Yes. Founders often negotiate for higher approval thresholds, equal treatment provisions, and liability caps to ensure fairness.
Most agreements require majority or supermajority consent (often 60 - 70%) from preferred shareholders, though this can vary by deal.
Yes, they typically bind all shareholders—including founders, employees, and option holders - unless carve-outs are negotiated.
Investors use drag-along rights to ensure that all shareholders participate in a sale, avoiding minority holdouts that could block or delay an exit.
Yes. Founders can push for broad-based weighted average terms, carve-outs for employee equity, or even conditional waivers to maintain alignment with investors.
Because it resets the conversion price to the lowest new share price, which can drastically dilute founders and employees even if only a small down round occurs.
The broad-based weighted average formula is the market standard, striking a balance between investor protection and founder dilution.
Issuing new equity at a lower price than earlier rounds (a “down round”) typically triggers the adjustment.
If an investor declines, the company can allocate those shares to other investors or new entrants, sometimes through overallotment provisions.
Yes. In later rounds, rights can often be sold or assigned, especially if the original investor lacks capital reserves.
Yes, most institutional investors request them, especially at seed and Series A. The scope and duration, however, are negotiable.
Founders with equity typically don’t need them, but sometimes advisors, accelerators, or insiders may negotiate for them.
In big exits (10x+ invested capital), liquidation preferences usually have little impact since all parties receive strong returns, but they can still influence exact distributions.
Yes. Founders can negotiate for 1x preferences, caps on participation, or paripassu treatment across rounds to maintain balance.

