Resources for insight and

inspiration

Tagline

Short heading here

Long subheading lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.

Short heading here

Subheading one
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.

Short heading here

Subheading one
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.

Short heading here

Subheading one
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.

Insights

NSOs v. ISOs: Strategic Equity Decisions for Startups

For startup founders, choosing between Non-Qualified Stock Options (NSOs) and Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) isn't just a matter of tax implications—it's a strategic decision that affects your ability to attract talent, manage company finances, and create the right incentives. Let's explore both options to help you make informed equity decisions for your venture.

Stock Options: An Overview

For startup employees, stock options represent more than just potential future wealth - they are a key part of compensation and long-term financial planning. Understanding how stock options work, and the differences between option types, can help you make informed decisions that align with your career and financial goals.

Stock Warrants in Startup Funding: Strategic Tools for Capital Raises

In the complex landscape of startup financing, stock warrants are often misunderstood but highly effective tools. Warrants give investors, lenders, or partners the right - but not the obligation - to buy shares at a set price in the future. When used strategically, warrants can provide flexibility in capital raising while aligning investor and company interests.

Common vs. Preferred Stock: A Startup's Guide to Equity Fundamentals

In the intricate world of startup financing, understanding the difference between common and preferred stock is crucial. These two types of equity are not just legal distinctions—they represent fundamentally different approaches to ownership, risk, and reward.

Not always, but they are common. Some early-stage investors accept uncapped SAFEs if they have strong conviction in the company.

A cap sets the maximum valuation for conversion, while a discount lowers the share price relative to the next round’s investors. Many instruments include both, and investors convert using whichever is more favorable.

Yes. While ROFRs protect control, they can limit founder or employee liquidity if structured too rigidly. Negotiating carve-outs can help preserve flexibility.

Typically 30–60 days, though shorter timelines may be negotiated to avoid deal delays.

Not always. ROFRs may apply only to certain classes (e.g., preferred stockholders) or exclude transfers such as estate planning or gifts.

A ROFR (Right of First Refusal) allows the company or investors to match a third-party offer. A ROFO (Right of First Offer) requires the shareholder to offer their shares internally before seeking outside buyers.

Yes. Founders often negotiate for higher approval thresholds, equal treatment provisions, and liability caps to ensure fairness.

Most agreements require majority or supermajority consent (often 60 - 70%) from preferred shareholders, though this can vary by deal.

Yes, they typically bind all shareholders—including founders, employees, and option holders - unless carve-outs are negotiated.

Investors use drag-along rights to ensure that all shareholders participate in a sale, avoiding minority holdouts that could block or delay an exit.

Yes. Founders can push for broad-based weighted average terms, carve-outs for employee equity, or even conditional waivers to maintain alignment with investors.

Because it resets the conversion price to the lowest new share price, which can drastically dilute founders and employees even if only a small down round occurs.

The broad-based weighted average formula is the market standard, striking a balance between investor protection and founder dilution.

Issuing new equity at a lower price than earlier rounds (a “down round”) typically triggers the adjustment.

If an investor declines, the company can allocate those shares to other investors or new entrants, sometimes through overallotment provisions.

Yes. In later rounds, rights can often be sold or assigned, especially if the original investor lacks capital reserves.

Yes, most institutional investors request them, especially at seed and Series A. The scope and duration, however, are negotiable.

Founders with equity typically don’t need them, but sometimes advisors, accelerators, or insiders may negotiate for them.

In big exits (10x+ invested capital), liquidation preferences usually have little impact since all parties receive strong returns, but they can still influence exact distributions.

Yes. Founders can negotiate for 1x preferences, caps on participation, or paripassu treatment across rounds to maintain balance.

Filter items
Search items
Schedule a Consultation
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.