Resources for insight and

inspiration

Tagline

Short heading here

Long subheading lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.

Short heading here

Subheading one
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.

Short heading here

Subheading one
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.

Short heading here

Subheading one
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.

Insights

What is a Plan of Merger, and When is it Required?

A Plan of Merger is a legal document that sets out the terms and conditions of a merger between two or more entities. It typically includes:

Stock Purchase vs. Asset Purchase

A stock purchase occurs when the buyer acquires shares of the target company directly from its shareholders. This gives the buyer ownership and control of the entire company, including its assets, liabilities, and contracts. Because the legal entity itself does not change, most contracts, licenses, and permits remain intact, allowing business operations to continue without disruption.

Key Advantages of an Asset Purchase

An asset purchase allows buyers to acquire selected assets and liabilities of a business instead of taking ownership of the entire entity. This structure offers several advantages:

Licensing Agreements for Startups: How to Protect, Monetize, and Scale Your IP

If your startup is built on software, content, data, or inventions, you likely need a Licensing Agreement. Whether you’re giving others the right to use your IP or licensing third-party tech for your own product, a well-drafted agreement is the key to protecting your rights and unlocking revenue.

Not always, but they are common. Some early-stage investors accept uncapped SAFEs if they have strong conviction in the company.

A cap sets the maximum valuation for conversion, while a discount lowers the share price relative to the next round’s investors. Many instruments include both, and investors convert using whichever is more favorable.

Yes. While ROFRs protect control, they can limit founder or employee liquidity if structured too rigidly. Negotiating carve-outs can help preserve flexibility.

Typically 30–60 days, though shorter timelines may be negotiated to avoid deal delays.

Not always. ROFRs may apply only to certain classes (e.g., preferred stockholders) or exclude transfers such as estate planning or gifts.

A ROFR (Right of First Refusal) allows the company or investors to match a third-party offer. A ROFO (Right of First Offer) requires the shareholder to offer their shares internally before seeking outside buyers.

Yes. Founders often negotiate for higher approval thresholds, equal treatment provisions, and liability caps to ensure fairness.

Most agreements require majority or supermajority consent (often 60 - 70%) from preferred shareholders, though this can vary by deal.

Yes, they typically bind all shareholders—including founders, employees, and option holders - unless carve-outs are negotiated.

Investors use drag-along rights to ensure that all shareholders participate in a sale, avoiding minority holdouts that could block or delay an exit.

Yes. Founders can push for broad-based weighted average terms, carve-outs for employee equity, or even conditional waivers to maintain alignment with investors.

Because it resets the conversion price to the lowest new share price, which can drastically dilute founders and employees even if only a small down round occurs.

The broad-based weighted average formula is the market standard, striking a balance between investor protection and founder dilution.

Issuing new equity at a lower price than earlier rounds (a “down round”) typically triggers the adjustment.

If an investor declines, the company can allocate those shares to other investors or new entrants, sometimes through overallotment provisions.

Yes. In later rounds, rights can often be sold or assigned, especially if the original investor lacks capital reserves.

Yes, most institutional investors request them, especially at seed and Series A. The scope and duration, however, are negotiable.

Founders with equity typically don’t need them, but sometimes advisors, accelerators, or insiders may negotiate for them.

In big exits (10x+ invested capital), liquidation preferences usually have little impact since all parties receive strong returns, but they can still influence exact distributions.

Yes. Founders can negotiate for 1x preferences, caps on participation, or paripassu treatment across rounds to maintain balance.

Filter items
Search items
Schedule a Consultation
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.