Resources for insight and
inspiration
Guides
Insights
Drag-Along Rights in Startup Financing: Streamlining Exits While Balancing Stakeholder Interests
When negotiating startup financing, founders often focus on valuation, equity splits, and immediate ownership. But long-term provisions in term sheets can be just as important, especially when it comes to company exits. One of the most impactful is the drag-along right.
Anti-Dilution Rights in Startup Funding: The Price Protection Mechanisms That Safeguard Investor Value
When structuring venture capital deals, founders often focus on valuation, investment size, and ownership splits. But within preferred stock agreements are provisions that can significantly reshape economics if future fundraising happens at lower valuations. Chief among these are anti-dilution protections.
Liquidation Preferences in Startup Funding: Critical Terms That Shape Exit Outcomes
When negotiating startup financing rounds, founders often focus on valuation, investment size, and ownership percentages. However, hidden within term sheets are provisions that can dramatically impact how exit proceeds are distributed. One of the most important of these provisions is the liquidation preference.
SAFEs: Streamlining Early-Stage Startup Investments
In today’s fast-moving startup ecosystem, the Simple Agreement for Future Equity (SAFE) has reshaped how early-stage companies raise capital. Introduced by Y Combinator in 2013, SAFEs were created to simplify fundraising while balancing the needs of both founders and investors.
FAQs
Open allFailing to use written agreements. Without NDAs and IP assignments, contractors or employees may legally claim ownership of information you thought was protected.
General skills and experience can move with an employee. But specific confidential information, such as code, strategies, or customer lists, is protected and cannot legally be taken.
Patents require public disclosure and registration, granting exclusive rights for a limited time. Trade secrets remain private and last indefinitely - as long as secrecy is maintained.
No. Unlike patents or trademarks, trade secrets are protected automatically if they meet legal requirements and you take reasonable steps to safeguard them.
It depends on your business. Most startups should prioritize trademarks for brand protection and copyrights for code and content. Patents make sense if you’ve built a unique, defensible innovation.
They may own the copyright or patent rights to what they create, even if you paid for it. Always require a signed assignment agreement.
Sometimes. Pure software code is protected by copyright, but certain software-related inventions (like unique algorithms or processes) may qualify for patents if they meet patent standards.
No. Trademarks gain limited protection through use, and copyrights exist automatically upon creation. But registration strengthens your rights and makes enforcement much easier.
Yes. Contractors often have access to sensitive information and customer relationships, so including a non-solicit in contractor agreements is recommended.
A non-solicit limits poaching of employees or customers, while a non-compete prevents someone from working for a competitor. Courts generally view non-solicits as more reasonable.
A typical duration is 12–18 months. Longer restrictions are more likely to be challenged in court.
Not always. Most states allow them if reasonable, but California restricts employee-related non-solicits. Customer-focused non-solicits may still be enforceable in certain cases.
No. Non-competes should be used cautiously, only in states where they’re enforceable and for roles where they are truly necessary. Otherwise, focus on enforceable alternatives.
Not necessarily. Strong confidentiality and invention assignment agreements often provide more reliable protection for IP and trade secrets.
A non-compete restricts where someone can work, while a non-solicitation clause only prevents them from taking your clients or employees. The latter is generally easier to enforce.
No. Some states, like California, ban them outright. Others only enforce them if they’re narrow and justified by a legitimate business interest.
Templates are a good starting point but rarely cover the specific needs of your business. Customized agreements reduce risk and ensure compliance with state and federal laws.
You may face IRS penalties, back taxes, unpaid benefits, wage claims, and potential lawsuits. States like California impose strict penalties for misclassification.
No. Independent contractors are responsible for their own benefits, insurance, and tax obligations unless you choose to offer additional perks in the contract.
Not entirely. The classification depends on how the work is structured. If you control when, how, and where they work, they’re likely an employee, even if the agreement calls them a contractor.