Resources for insight and

inspiration

Tagline

Short heading here

Long subheading lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.

Short heading here

Subheading one
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.

Short heading here

Subheading one
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.

Short heading here

Subheading one
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros.

Insights

Trade Secrets: The Hidden IP Every Startup Should Care About

Most startup founders think about patents and trademarks. But trade secrets can be just as valuable - and easier to protect. Unlike patents, trade secrets don’t require registration. But they do require vigilance.

Trademarks vs. Copyrights vs. Patents: A Startup Guide to IP Protection

Startups thrive on ideas - but ideas only create value if they’re protected. Intellectual property (IP) safeguards your brand, your creative work, and your innovations. From your logo to your code to your inventions, knowing which type of IP applies is essential to protecting your edge and building long-term value.

Non-Solicitation Clauses Explained

When an employee leaves your startup, there’s always a risk they’ll try to take your people or customers with them. That’s where non-solicitation clauses come in - they’re a powerful, often enforceable tool to protect your business after key team members depart.

Should Startups Use Non-Compete Clauses? Here’s What Founders Need to Know

In the fast-moving startup world, it’s natural to want protection against former employees joining a competitor. That’s why non-compete clauses have been popular for years. But the legal landscape is changing - raising real questions about whether they’re enforceable, useful, or even worth including.

Not always, but they are common. Some early-stage investors accept uncapped SAFEs if they have strong conviction in the company.

A cap sets the maximum valuation for conversion, while a discount lowers the share price relative to the next round’s investors. Many instruments include both, and investors convert using whichever is more favorable.

Yes. While ROFRs protect control, they can limit founder or employee liquidity if structured too rigidly. Negotiating carve-outs can help preserve flexibility.

Typically 30–60 days, though shorter timelines may be negotiated to avoid deal delays.

Not always. ROFRs may apply only to certain classes (e.g., preferred stockholders) or exclude transfers such as estate planning or gifts.

A ROFR (Right of First Refusal) allows the company or investors to match a third-party offer. A ROFO (Right of First Offer) requires the shareholder to offer their shares internally before seeking outside buyers.

Yes. Founders often negotiate for higher approval thresholds, equal treatment provisions, and liability caps to ensure fairness.

Most agreements require majority or supermajority consent (often 60 - 70%) from preferred shareholders, though this can vary by deal.

Yes, they typically bind all shareholders—including founders, employees, and option holders - unless carve-outs are negotiated.

Investors use drag-along rights to ensure that all shareholders participate in a sale, avoiding minority holdouts that could block or delay an exit.

Yes. Founders can push for broad-based weighted average terms, carve-outs for employee equity, or even conditional waivers to maintain alignment with investors.

Because it resets the conversion price to the lowest new share price, which can drastically dilute founders and employees even if only a small down round occurs.

The broad-based weighted average formula is the market standard, striking a balance between investor protection and founder dilution.

Issuing new equity at a lower price than earlier rounds (a “down round”) typically triggers the adjustment.

If an investor declines, the company can allocate those shares to other investors or new entrants, sometimes through overallotment provisions.

Yes. In later rounds, rights can often be sold or assigned, especially if the original investor lacks capital reserves.

Yes, most institutional investors request them, especially at seed and Series A. The scope and duration, however, are negotiable.

Founders with equity typically don’t need them, but sometimes advisors, accelerators, or insiders may negotiate for them.

In big exits (10x+ invested capital), liquidation preferences usually have little impact since all parties receive strong returns, but they can still influence exact distributions.

Yes. Founders can negotiate for 1x preferences, caps on participation, or paripassu treatment across rounds to maintain balance.

Filter items
Search items
Schedule a Consultation
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.