Resources for insight and
inspiration
Guides
Insights
Management Rights Letter: Granting Institutional Investors Oversight Access
When startups take money from venture capital funds subject to ERISA or similar regulations, those funds need a special document: the Management Rights Letter (MRL). This short but powerful agreement ensures the investor has sufficient rights to “manage” their investment, helping them comply with legal requirements.
Indemnification Agreement: Personal Protection for Startup Directors and Officers
When startup leaders make tough calls - hiring, spending, pivoting - they expose themselves to personal liability. The Indemnification Agreement serves as a legal shield, protecting directors and officers against lawsuits, claims, and costs incurred while serving the company.
ROFR and Co-Sale Agreement: Managing Share Transfers While Preserving Cap Table Control
In venture-backed startups, control of the cap table is critical. The Right of First Refusal and Co-Sale Agreement (ROFR/Co-Sale) helps founders and investors maintain that control by regulating how shares are transferred - particularly when founders, early employees, or other major holders want to sell.
Voting Agreement: Aligning Shareholder Power in Key Company Decisions
While founders often assume they’ll control their company post-funding, the Voting Agreement tells a more nuanced story. This document outlines how shareholders agree to vote their shares on critical company matters, including board elections and future financing approvals.
FAQs
Open allFailing to use written agreements. Without NDAs and IP assignments, contractors or employees may legally claim ownership of information you thought was protected.
General skills and experience can move with an employee. But specific confidential information, such as code, strategies, or customer lists, is protected and cannot legally be taken.
Patents require public disclosure and registration, granting exclusive rights for a limited time. Trade secrets remain private and last indefinitely - as long as secrecy is maintained.
No. Unlike patents or trademarks, trade secrets are protected automatically if they meet legal requirements and you take reasonable steps to safeguard them.
It depends on your business. Most startups should prioritize trademarks for brand protection and copyrights for code and content. Patents make sense if you’ve built a unique, defensible innovation.
They may own the copyright or patent rights to what they create, even if you paid for it. Always require a signed assignment agreement.
Sometimes. Pure software code is protected by copyright, but certain software-related inventions (like unique algorithms or processes) may qualify for patents if they meet patent standards.
No. Trademarks gain limited protection through use, and copyrights exist automatically upon creation. But registration strengthens your rights and makes enforcement much easier.
Yes. Contractors often have access to sensitive information and customer relationships, so including a non-solicit in contractor agreements is recommended.
A non-solicit limits poaching of employees or customers, while a non-compete prevents someone from working for a competitor. Courts generally view non-solicits as more reasonable.
A typical duration is 12–18 months. Longer restrictions are more likely to be challenged in court.
Not always. Most states allow them if reasonable, but California restricts employee-related non-solicits. Customer-focused non-solicits may still be enforceable in certain cases.
No. Non-competes should be used cautiously, only in states where they’re enforceable and for roles where they are truly necessary. Otherwise, focus on enforceable alternatives.
Not necessarily. Strong confidentiality and invention assignment agreements often provide more reliable protection for IP and trade secrets.
A non-compete restricts where someone can work, while a non-solicitation clause only prevents them from taking your clients or employees. The latter is generally easier to enforce.
No. Some states, like California, ban them outright. Others only enforce them if they’re narrow and justified by a legitimate business interest.
Templates are a good starting point but rarely cover the specific needs of your business. Customized agreements reduce risk and ensure compliance with state and federal laws.
You may face IRS penalties, back taxes, unpaid benefits, wage claims, and potential lawsuits. States like California impose strict penalties for misclassification.
No. Independent contractors are responsible for their own benefits, insurance, and tax obligations unless you choose to offer additional perks in the contract.
Not entirely. The classification depends on how the work is structured. If you control when, how, and where they work, they’re likely an employee, even if the agreement calls them a contractor.